forlifepasob.blogg.se

Late 2008 macbook hard drive replacement
Late 2008 macbook hard drive replacement







late 2008 macbook hard drive replacement
  1. #LATE 2008 MACBOOK HARD DRIVE REPLACEMENT PRO#
  2. #LATE 2008 MACBOOK HARD DRIVE REPLACEMENT MAC#

MacBook :: Replacing A Dead Hard Drive?.MacBook :: Replacing Hard Drive - Will It Fit Properly?.OS X :: Replacing MacBook Hard Drive - Nothing On Display.

late 2008 macbook hard drive replacement

#LATE 2008 MACBOOK HARD DRIVE REPLACEMENT PRO#

  • MacBook Pro :: Replacing Hard Drive - 7200 RPM.
  • MacBook :: Replacing Hard Drive - How Does It Perform.
  • OS X :: Replacing Hard Drive From 160 To 500GB On MacBook.
  • MacBook Pro :: Replacing Hard Drive With An Ssd.
  • MacBook Pro :: Replacing The Hard Drive?.
  • MacBook :: What To Do After Replacing Hard Drive?.
  • #LATE 2008 MACBOOK HARD DRIVE REPLACEMENT MAC#

    Intel Mac :: Replacing Hard Drive On A 2009.

    late 2008 macbook hard drive replacement

    Why wont the external drive boot when run internally? View 6 Replies I swapped back the original drive and it boots up fine. I have previously booted from the disk via usb, so i know there is a bootable partition on it. When I turn the machine on it tells me that there is no bootable disk. I swapped my hard disk on the above mentioned machine and it won't boot. It's certainly better eye candy and matches the MacBook and MacBook Pro more closely than the alternatives.įor more info, see the LED Display SPECIFICATIONS PAGE.MacBook Pro :: Replacing Mid-2009 15" Hard Drive? Jul 8, 2009 It's about time that Apple add the iSight camera to a Cinema Display! It's more expensive than the Dell 24" UltraSharp 2408WFP with its landscape to portrait pivot feature, higher contrast ratio, and faster pixel response, but I think the new Apple 24" Cinema's LED-backlit screen, aluminum and glass enclosure, integrated iSight camera, and MagSafe charger make it worth the extra $$$. PSSST - REGARDING THE NEW APPLE LED 24" CINEMA DISPLAY. There are several articles listed there in close date proximity. We have tested USB 2.0 ports on the 'late 2008' 13" MacBook and can confirm that it has the same faster transfer rate as the 'late 2008' 15" MacBook Pro.Ĭheck our INDEX page for more articles featuring the "late 2008" MacBook Pro. If you have one of those HD videocams that Steve Jobs mentioned, at least the USB 2.0 port won't be the bottleneck when iMovie imports and converts the AVCHD files to Apple Intermediate Codec. Though the write speed is not as fast on the MBP as the Mac Pro, it is certainly a useful option for those seeking the fastest exernal storage option for their laptop.įinally, USB 2.0 is performing on the Mac as we expected it to when it was first added. What SATA lacks in convenience (not built-in to MBP, no bus power), it makes up for in speed. But we also wanted to see how fast the much faster 3.5" drive would go so we stuck the 1.5TB Seagate Barracuda in a SATA enclosure and connected it to the same LaCie SATA II ExpressCard/34. One was the apparent choice for a MacBook Pro: a notebook drive in a SATA enclosure connected to a SATA Expresscard. And absolutely no SATA drive enclosure will run off of bus power - though one example cleverly "borrows" power from a FireWire 400 port - if you have one. Only very wimpy USB 2.0 drives will run off of USB bus power. Connect it to the USB 2.0 or SATA ports and you have to use that pesky AC adapter. It's a RAID 0 dual notebook drive "sandwich" that runs off of bus power when connected to the FW800 port. One of my favorites is the LaCie Little Big Disk Quadra (quad interface). There's nothing more convenient than a fast, bus powered FireWire 800 drive enclosure - especially when used with a MacBook Pro. Though it's still not quite as fast as FireWire 400, it's close enough to explain why Apple did away with the FW400 port on all new MacBooks and MacBook Pros.įIREWIRE 800 IS FASTER STILL and MORE CONVENIENT Up until now, every time we tested a USB 2.0 storage device on a Mac, the transfer rate was about half that of FireWire 400 even though it had a higher theoretical speed rating (480Mbit/s). USB 2.0 IS TRULY FASTER - BUT STILL NOT QUITE AS FAST AS FIREWIRE 400 Test results are the Extended 20-100MB Test from SpeedTools QuickBench. USB 2.0 = WD Scorpio Black 7200rpm 320GB SATA 3G 2.5" notebook drive in TransIntl miniXpress 825 S connected to the Built-in USB 2.0 Port of the 'late 2008' MacBook Pro 2.8GHz SATA (N) = WD Scorpio Black 7200rpm 320GB SATA 3G 2.5" notebook drive in TransIntl miniXpress 825 S connected to LaCie SATA II ExpressCard/34įireWire 800 = WD Scorpio Black 7200rpm 320GB SATA 3G 2.5" notebook drive in TransIntl miniXpress 825 S connected to the Built-in FW800 Port of the 'late 2008' MacBook Pro 2.8GHzįireWire 400 = WD Scorpio Black 7200rpm 320GB SATA 3G 2.5" notebook drive in TransIntl miniXpress 825 connected to the Built-in FW400 Port of the 'early 2008' MacBook Pro 2.6GHz SATA (D) = Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB SATA 3G 3.5" desktop drive in Wiebetech RTX 400 quad interface "tray free" enclosure connected to LaCie SATA II ExpressCard/34









    Late 2008 macbook hard drive replacement